Grant v. Western Governors University

2:25-cv-00631Utd13.01.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
RODERICK MARTIN GRANT,
Plaintiff,
v.
WESTERN GOVERNORS
UNIVERSITY,
ORDER AFFIRMING & ADOPTING
REPORT & RECOMMENDATION
Case No. 2:25-CV-631-DAK-DBP
Judge Dale A. Kimball
Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead
Defendant.
This case was assigned to United States District Court Judge Dale A. Kimball, who then
referred the case to United States Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(B). On December 11, 2025, Magistrate Judge Pead issued a Report and
Recommendation [ECF No. 11], recommending that the court grant Defendant’s Motion for a
Pre-Fling Order and Motion for Stay of Response Deadlines.
The Report and Recommendation notified Plaintiff that any objection to the Report and
Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days of receiving it. As of the date of this Order,
Plaintiff has not filed an Objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the time for doing so
has passed.
A Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is subject to de novo review by this
court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The court has reviewed the
Report and Recommendation and the record de novo and agrees with Magistrate Judge Pead’s
analysis and recommendations in their entirety. Therefore, the court adopts and affirms
Case 2:25-cv-00631-DAK Document 73 Filed 01/13/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 1
of 2
2
Magistrate Judge Pead’s Report and Recommendation as the Order of the court. Accordingly,
the court grants Defendant’s Motion for Pre-Filing Order [ECF No. 56] and Defendant’s Motion
to Stay Response Deadlines [ECF No. 57].
DATED this 13th day of January 2026.
BY THE COURT:
DALE A. KIMBALL
United States District Judge
Case 2:25-cv-00631-DAK Document 73 Filed 01/13/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 2
of 2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.