5:26-cv-00154•Rahimzadeh v. NOEM et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION ERFAN RAHIMZADEH § § § § § VS. KRISTI NOEM1 et al. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:26-cv-154 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Court referred Petitioner’s Writ of Habeas Corpus and Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss to United States Magistrate Judge Diana Song Quiroga for a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 14). After holding a hearing, Judge Song Quiroga found that Petitioner met his burden under the Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001) framework to demonstrate that his removal was not reasonably foreseeable, and that Respondents failed to rebut that showing (Dkt. No. 20 at 7–10). Judge Song Quiroga contemplated the breakdown in diplomatic relations with the United States and Iran, finding they provide an independent barrier to Petitioner’s repatriation to Iran (Dkt. No. 20 at 9). Finally, Judge Song Quiroga highlights that Petitioner’s only criminal history relates to his illegal entry conviction (Dkt. No. 20 at 10). Considering all factors, Judge Song Quiroga recommends Petitioner’s release (Dkt. No. 20 at 11). The fourteen-day objection period has lapsed, and no party objected to this recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error. CGI Logistics, LLC v. Fast Logistik, No. 5:23-CV- 43, 2023 WL 8313341, at *2 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 1, 2023) (Garcia Marmolejo, J.) (citing United 1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), Markwayne Mullin is automatically substituted for Respondent Kristi Noem in this case. David Venturella is substituted for Respondent Todd Lyons under this same rule. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to substitute these parties on the docket sheet. United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED July 09, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Case 5:26-cv-00154 Document 21 Filed 07/09/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
2 States v. Soto, 734 F. App’x 258, 259 (5th Cir. 2018)); see also Cao v. BSI Fin. Servs., Inc., 858 F. App’x 156, 158 (5th Cir. 2021). Finding none, the Court hereby ADOPTS IN WHOLE Judge Song Quiroga’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 20). Accordingly, Petitioner’s Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED (Dkt. No. 1). Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss is DENIED (Dkt. No. 11). Respondents are ORDERED to RELEASE Petitioner from custody to a public place no later than 5:00 p.m. on July 13, 2026. Petitioner’s release is subject to 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(3) and 8 C.F.R. § 241.5. Respondents are ORDERED to NOTIFY Petitioner’s counsel of the exact location and exact time of his release as soon as practicable and no less than two hours before his release. The parties are ORDERED to file a Joint Status Report no later than 5:00 p.m. on July 15, 2026, confirming that Petitioner has been released. It is so ORDERED. SIGNED July 9, 2026. ___________________________________ Marina Garcia Marmolejo United States District Judge Case 5:26-cv-00154 Document 21 Filed 07/09/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.