4:25-cv-05796•Allaico Pacheco et al v. Joyce et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------- MARIA SONIA ALLAICO PACHECO; MISHELL ALEXANDRA QUINTUNA ALLAICO, Petitioners, -v- WILLIAM JOYCE, in his official capacity as acting New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, KRISTI NOEM, in her capacity as Secretary for the United States Department of Homeland Security; PAMELA BONDI, in her official capacity as the Attorney General of the United States, Respondents. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : X 25-CV-09348 (JAV) ORDER JEANNETTE A. VARGAS, United States District Judge: On November 9, a petition for writ of habeas corpus (“Petition”) was filed on behalf of Maria Sonia Allaico Pacheco and Mishell Alexandra Quintuna Allaico (“Petitioners”). ECF No. 1, ¶ 1. The petition seeks relief to remedy Petitioners’ purportedly unlawful detention by the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”). Id. at 20. The Court hereby ORDERS that Petitioners shall not be removed from the United States unless and until the Court orders otherwise in order to preserve the Court’s jurisdiction pending its consideration of the habeas petition. See, e.g., Local 1814, Intern. Longshoremen’s Ass’n, AFL-CIO v. New York Shipping Ass’n, Inc., 965 F.2d 1224, 1237 (2d Cir. 1992) (“Once the district court acquires jurisdiction over the subject matter of, and the parties to, the litigation, the All Writs Act [28 U.S.C. § 1651] authorizes a federal court to protect that jurisdiction” (cleaned up)); Garcia-Izquierdo v. Gartner, No. 04-CV-7377 (RCC), 2004 WL 2093515, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Case 4:25-cv-05796 Document 2 Filed on 11/10/25 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
2 Sept. 17, 2004) (observing that, under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, a district court “may order that a petitioner’s deportation be stayed . . . when a stay is necessary to preserve the Court’s jurisdiction of the case”); cf. Michael v. I.N.S., 48 F.3d 657, 661-62 (2d Cir. 1995) (holding that the All Writs Act provides a federal court of appeals reviewing a final removal order with a basis to stay removal). A conference shall be held in this matter on November 13, 2025, at 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom 14C, United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York. The Clerk of Court is directed to transmit a copy of this Order upon the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York (the “USAO”). The USAO shall take immediate steps to notify appropriate officials at ICE of this Order, and shall file a status report by no later than November 12, 2025, at 5:00 p.m. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 10, 2025 _____________________________ ___ New York, New York JEANNETTE A. VARGAS United States District Judge Case 4:25-cv-05796 Document 2 Filed on 11/10/25 in TXSD Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.