Alexander v. Montgomery County Community Supervision & Corrections Department, et al

4:25-cv-04209Txsd08.04.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
MARGARET ALEXANDRA ALEXANDER 	§
vs
MONTGOMERY COUNTY COMMUNITY
SUPERVISION & CORRECTIONS, et al
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-25-4209
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
Pending before the Court in the above referenced proceeding is Defendants Montgomery
County Sheriffs Office, Montgomery County District Attorney' s Office, Montgomery County
Community Supervision & Corrections Department, Montgomery County Attorney' s Office, Brett
Ligon, and Laurie Frankenfield (Montgomery County Defendants) Joint Motion to Dismiss (Doc.
No 53) and Defendant the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services' (DFPS) Motion to
Dismiss (Doc. No. 54) together responses and replies, and Magistrate Judge Bennett's Memorandum
and Recommendation (Doc. No . 101). 	Plaintiff has filed objections (Doc. No. 102) to the
Memorandum and Recommendation.
The Court has carefully reviewed, de novo, the filings, the applicable law, the Magistrate
Judge' s Memorandum and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, and agrees with the
Magistrate Judge ' s conclusions. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that Plaintiff Objections (Doc. No. 102) are OVERRULED; the Memorandum
and Recommendation (Doc. No. 101) is ADOPTED; and Defendants Montgomery County Sheriff's
Office, 	Montgomery 	County 	District 	Attorney' s 	Office, 	Montgomery 	County 	Community
Supervision & Corrections Department, Montgomery County Attorney' s Office, Brett Ligon, and
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
April 08, 2026
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 4:25-cv-04209 Document 103 Filed 04/08/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
Laurie Frankenfield Joint Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No 53) and Defendant the Texas Department of
Family and Protective Services' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 54) are GRANTED. 	Plaintiffs
Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE It is further
ORDERED that all other pending motions (Doc. Nos. 11 , 13, 14, 20, 24, 26, 41 , 79) are
DENIED AS MOOT . .
-('---
SIGNED on this __'o'	__ day of April 2026.
ANDREW S. HANEN ......___
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Case 4:25-cv-04209 Document 103 Filed 04/08/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.