Robertson v. TrueAccord Corp et al

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 4:25-cv-02816 Document 40 Filed 03/10/26 in TXSD Page1of2
United States District Court

Southem District of Texas
ENTERED
March 10, 2026
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
JASMINE ROBERTSON, §
§
Plaintiff, §
§
VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:25-CV-02816

§
TRUEACCORD CORP, et al, §
§
Defendants. §

ORDER

Before the Court are United States Magistrate Judge Christina A. Bryan’s Memoranda and
Recommendations filed on February 18, 2026 (Doc. #38) and February 19, 2026 (Doc. #39), The
deadline for filing objections has passed, and no objections have been filed. Pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has reviewed both Memoranda and Recommendations
for clear error. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989). Finding no clear
error, the Court adopts both Memoranda and Recommendations in their entirety.

Accordingly, Defendant TrueAccord Corporation’s (“TrueAccord”) Motion to Dismiss
(Doc, #8) is GRANTED. Further, TrueAccord’s converted motion for summary judgment (see
Doc. #33) is GRANTED. All pro se Piaintiff’s claims against TrueAccord are DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendant TrueAccord Corporation
from the docket.

Furthermore, Defendant January Technologies, Inc.’s (“January”) Motion to Dismiss (Doc.
#9) is hereby GRANTED IN PART. January’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to the FDCPA

claims, and GRANTED as to the TCPA claim.

AUTHENTICATED
U.S. GOVERNMENT
INFORMATION

GPO

Case 4:25-cv-02816 Document 40 Filed 03/10/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2

Finally, pro se Plaintiff Jasmine Robertson’s claims for violations of the FDCPA against
Defendant January Technologies, Inc. (Doc. #4 at 6-9) remain pending.

It is so ORDERED.

MAR 1.0 2026
Date The Honorable Alfred H. Bennett
United States District Judge