Kasarda v. Fay Servicing, LLC et al

3:25-cv-00183Txsd29.05.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
GALVESTON DIVISION
TEANNA KASARDA,
Plaintiff.
V.
FAY SERVICING, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:25-cv-00183
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
On April 17, 2026, all pretrial matters in this case were referred to United
States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Dkt. 20.
Judge Edison filed a memorandum and recommendation on May 11, 2026,
recommending that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 14) be
granted. Dkt. 22.
No objections have been filed to the memorandum and recommendation.
Accordingly, the court reviews it for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).
Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the court finds
that there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly:
(1) 	Judge Edison’s memorandum and recommendation (Dkt. 22) is
approved and adopted in its entirety as the holding of the court; and
(2) 	Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 14) is granted.
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
May 29, 2026
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 3:25-cv-00183 Document 23 Filed 05/29/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
2
SIGNED on Galveston Island this 29th day of May 2026.
______________________________
JEFFREY VINCENT BROWN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:25-cv-00183 Document 23 Filed 05/29/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.