Ramos v. Corpus Christi Independent School District et al

2:26-cv-00143Txsd22.07.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
July 22, 2026
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 2:26-cv-00143 Document 13 Filed 07/22/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
Case 2:26-cv-00143 Document 13 Filed 07/22/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 2:26-cv-00143 Document13 _ Filed 07/22/26 in TXSD Page1of2

United States District Court

Southem District of Texas
ENTERED
July 22, 2026
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
ADRIAN RAMOS, §
§
Plaintiff, §
§
v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:26-CV-00143
§
CORPUS CHRISTI INDEPENDENT §
SCHOOL DISTRICT, ef al., §
§
Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock’s Memorandum and
Recommendation (““M&R”). (D.E. 10). The M&R recommends the Court dismiss Plaintiff's
claims without prejudice and deny as moot Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis,
(D.E. 2). (D.E. 10, p. 2).

The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate
Judge’s M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No
objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only
determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United
States y. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell vy. Litton Loan
Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700, 2015 WL 3823141, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon,
J.) (citation omitted).

Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings
of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous
or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 10). Accordingly, the Court
DISMISSES Plaintiff's claims without prejudice, (D.E. 1), and DENIES as moot Plaintiff's

1/2

AUTHENTICATED
U.S. GOVERNMENT
INFORMATION

GPO

Case 2:26-cv-00143 Document 13

motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (D.E. 2).

SO ORDERED.

Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas
July 227, 2026

2/2

Filed 07/22/26 in TXSD__— Page 2 of 2

\,
DAVID'S. MORALES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.