2:26-cv-00020•Brock-Sellers v. Bobby Siscoe LLC, et al. The Court will not accept any filings where leave has not been granted until the date of the Initial Conference. See DE 24
Brock-Sellers v. Bobby Siscoe LLC, et al. The Court will not accept any filings where leave has not been granted until the date of the Initial Conference. See DE 24
2:26-cv-00020Txsd27.03.2026
Gesamter Gesetzestext
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED March 27, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Case 2:26-cv-00020 Document 39 Filed 03/27/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
Case 2:26-cv-00020 Document 39 Filed 03/27/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
Case 2:26-cv-00020 Document 39 Filed 03/27/26 in TXSD Page1of2 United States District Court Southem District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT March 27, 2026 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION ANGELA M. BROCK-SELLERS, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:26-CV-00020 V. BOBBY SISCOE LLC, et al., Lr Lr Lr Lr Lr Lr Lr Lr Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton’s Memorandum and Recommendation (““M&R”). (D.E. 34). The M&R recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff's motion to remand. (D.E. 7). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700, 2015 WL 3823141, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.) (citation omitted). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the Parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 34). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs motion to remand, (D.E. 7), REMANDS this case to the 156th Judicial District Court of Bee County, Texas, and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this 1/2 AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO Case 2:26-cv-00020 Document 39 Filed 03/27/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2 Order to the same. The Court further DENIES as moot all pending motions in this case. SO ORDERED. x) LAK DA\IBS. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas March 27, 2026 Li 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.