Solomon v. Page et al

1 / 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
TERRY SOLOMON, JR.,
Plaintiff,
VS.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-00256
LARRY PAGE, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s complaint (D.E. 1, 11, 12) for initial
screening under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c); 28 U.S.C.
§§1915(e)(2), 1915A. On October 18, 2025, United States Magistrate Judge Mitchel
Neurock issued a Memorandum and Recommendation (M&R, D.E. 13), recommending
that Plaintiff’s case be dismissed as frivolous.
Thereafter, Plaintiff timely filed two documents that purport to be his objections
(D.E. 16, 18). However, they do not point out with particularity any error in the M&R as
required in order to be considered. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Instead, they merely suggest
that the Court conduct discovery on his behalf to learn the truth of his allegations. These
are not proper objections and are OVERRULED.
Having reviewed the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations set
forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation, as well as Plaintiff’s
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
November 24, 2025
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 2:25-cv-00256 Document 19 Filed on 11/24/25 in TXSD Page 1 of 2

2 / 2
objections, and all other relevant documents in the record, and having made a de novo
disposition of the portions of the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation
to which objections were specifically directed, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiff’s
objections and ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.
Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous.
ORDERED on November 24, 2025.
_______________________________
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:25-cv-00256 Document 19 Filed on 11/24/25 in TXSD Page 2 of 2