Otero v. City of Rockport et al

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 2:25-cv-00246 Documenti8 _ Filed 11/13/25in TXSD Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

Southem District of Texas
ENTERED
November 13, 2025
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
MATTHEW OTERO, §
§
Plaintiff, 8
§
Vv. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-00246

§
CITY OF ROCKPORT, e¢ ai., §
§
Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton’s Memorandum and
Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 11). The M&R recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's
motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and preliminary injunction, (D.E. 5); (D.E. 11,
p. 1).

The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate
Judge’s M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No
objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only
determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United
States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan
Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700, 2015 WL 3823141, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon,
J.) (citation omitted).

Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings
of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous
or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 11). Accordingly, the Court

DENIES Plaintiff's motion for a TRO and preliminary injunction. (D.E. 5).

1/2

AUTHENTICATED
U.S. GOVERNMENT
INFORMATION

GPO

Case 2:25-cv-00246 Documenti8_ Filed 11/13/25 inTXSD_ Page 2 of 2

SO ORDERED. . OWL.

DAVI ORALES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas
November / 3445025

2/2