2:25-cv-00240•Gomez v. Masters et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 / 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION ARMANDO GOMEZ, Plaintiff, VS. § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-00240 KELVIN D. MASTERS, et al., Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AND RETAIN CASE On November 13, 2025, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his “Memorandum and Recommendation to Dismiss Certain Claims and Retain Case” (D.E. 17). Plaintiff was provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation (D.E. 17), and all other relevant United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED December 16, 2025 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Case 2:25-cv-00240 Document 23 Filed on 12/16/25 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
2 / 2 documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Court: • RETAINS the Eighth Amendment claims of excessive force and failure to protect against: (1) Warden Kelvin D. Masters; (2) Lt. Adan A. Cavazos; (3) Sgt. Linda M. Perez; and (4) Officer Eisa M. Chapa in their individual capacities; • DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s claims for money damages against Defendants in their official capacities as barred by the Eleventh Amendment; • DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE all of Plaintiff’s remaining claims for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1). ORDERED on December 16, 2025. _______________________________ NELVA GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 2:25-cv-00240 Document 23 Filed on 12/16/25 in TXSD Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.