Flores v. Aransas County et al

1 / 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
EDWARD FLORES, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
VS.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-00162
ARANSAS COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On November 18, 2025, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his
“Memorandum and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge” (D.E. 22). The
parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s
memorandum and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General
Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error
on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing
Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the
Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation (D.E. 22), and all other relevant
documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
December 04, 2025
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 2:25-cv-00162 Document 23 Filed on 12/04/25 in TXSD Page 1 of 2

2 / 2
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Defendants’ motion to
dismiss (D.E. 12) is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
ORDERED on December 4, 2025.
_______________________________
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:25-cv-00162 Document 23 Filed on 12/04/25 in TXSD Page 2 of 2