Luna v. Dudek

1 / 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
ROEL L.,1
Plaintiff,
VS.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-00083
LELAND DUDEK,
Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
On February 10, 2026, United States Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton issued her
“Memorandum and Recommendation” (D.E. 14), recommending that Roel’s construed
motion for summary judgment (D.E. 9) be denied, the Commissioner’s construed motion
for summary judgment (D.E. 12) be granted, and this cause of action be dismissed. The
parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s
memorandum and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General
Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error
on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and
1 Pursuant to the May 1, 2018 “Memorandum Re: Privacy Concern Regarding Social Security and Immigration
Opinions” issued by the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the
United States, this order uses only Plaintiff’s first name and last initial.
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
March 06, 2026
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 2:25-cv-00083 Document 15 Filed 03/06/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2

2 / 2
recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing
Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the
Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation (D.E. 14), and all other relevant
documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Roel’s motion (D.E. 9) is
DENIED, the Commissioner’s motion (D.E. 12) is GRANTED, and this cause of action
is DISMISSED.
ORDERED on March 6, 2026.
_______________________________
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:25-cv-00083 Document 15 Filed 03/06/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2