Bazan v. O'Malley

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 2:24-cv-00282 Document 21 Filed 11/17/25in TXSD Page1of2

United States District Court
Southem District of Texas

ENTERED

November 17, 2025
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Nathan Ochsner, Clerk

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
KRISTOPHER BAZAN,
. Plaintiff,
v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-00282

MARTIN O’MALLEY, et ai.,

Defendants.

(> 6? 6? (Pn Ur? HO? 40D CO2 (OD

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton’s Memorandum and
Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 20). The M&R recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff's
motion for attorney fees. Jd. at 2.

The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate
Judge’s M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No
objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only
determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United
States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan |
Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700, 2015 WL 3823141, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon,
J.) (citation omitted).

Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings
of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erronéous
or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 20). Accordingly, the Court
GRANTS Plaintiff's motion for attorney fees. (D.E. 19).

SO ORDERED.

AUTHENTICATED
U.S. GOVERNMENT
INFORMATION

GPO

Case 2:24-cv-00282 Document 21 Filed 11/17/25in TXSD Page 2 of 2

CUM

DAVID S-MORALES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas
November 1942025