Abdivaitulu v. Noem et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BROWNSVILLE DIVISION
RAKHMONALI A., §
“Petitioner,” §
§
v. §
§
Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-00357
MARKWAYNE MULLIN, et. al., in their
official capacities,
“Respondents.”
§
§
§
ORDER
Before the Court is Petitioner’s “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Complaint for Emergency
Injunctive Relief” (Dkt. No. 1) (“Petition”), Respondents’ “Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
and Motion for Summary Judgment” (Dkt. No. 11) (“MSJ”), and the Magistrate Judge’s “Report and
Recommendation to Deny Petitioner’s Habeas Petition” (Dkt. No. 14) (“R&R”). The R&R recommends
that the Court (1) deny the Petition (Dkt. No. 1), (2) deny the MSJ (Dkt. No. 11) as moot, and (3) direct the
Clerk of Court to close the case. Dkt. No. 14 at 2.
Objections to the R&R were due May 22, 2026. No objections were filed. If there have been no
objections to the magistrate’s ruling, the Court reviews the magistrate judge’s conclusions for clear error.
See Guillory v. PPG Indus., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005).
Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the R&R (Dkt. No. 14) is
ADOPTED. The Petition (Dkt. No. 1) is DENIED and the MSJ (Dkt. No. 11) is DENIED as moot. The
Clerk of the Court is hereby ORDERED to close this case.
SIGNED this June 25, 2026
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
June 25, 2026
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 1:25-cv-00357 Document 15 Filed 06/25/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 1