Ramos Argueta v. Noem et al

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 1:25-cv-00112 Document 8 Filed 01/14/26 in TXSD
Page 1 of 2
United States District Court Southern District of Texas
ENTERED January 14, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION
DARWIN E. RAMOS ARGUETA, "Petitioner,"
§
§
V. KRISTI NOEM, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, et al., "Respondents." §
§ Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-00112
§ §
ORDER
Before the Court are Petitioner's "Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241" (Dkt. No. 2) ("Petition"), the "Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations" (Dkt. No. 6) ("R&R"), and "Petitioner's "Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as Moot" (Dkt. No. 7) ("MTD"). The R&R recommends this Court 1) order Petitioner's counsel to "show cause as to why she should not be sanctioned for failure to comply with" a court order and 2) dismiss the Petition without prejudice for failure to prosecute, serve, and comply with a court order. Dkt. No. 6 at 3.
The R&R was published December 22, 2025. Dkt. No. 6. Objections to the R&R were due January 5, 2026. No objections have been filed. The Court thus reviews the R&R's conclusions for plain error. See Guillory v. PPG Indus., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005).
Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the R&R (Dkt. No. 6). The Petition (Dkt. No. 2) is DISMISSED without prejudice, and the MTD (Dkt. No. 7) is DENIED as moot. Petitioner's counsel is ORDERED to show cause as to why she should not be sanctioned for flouting a court order by February 13, 2026, at 5 pm CST. The Clerk of the Court is hereby ORDERED to close this case.
1
AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO

Case 1:25-cv-00112 Document8_ Filed 01/14/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2

Signed on this 14" day of January, 2026.

Qi SY

Rolgfido Olvera
United States District Judge