1:25-cv-00069•Mares et al v. National Treasury Employees Union, Chapter 160 et al
Mares et al v. National Treasury Employees Union, Chapter 160 et al
1:25-cv-00069Txsd14.01.2026
Gesamter Gesetzestext
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED January 14, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Case 1:25-cv-00069 Document 26 Filed 01/14/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
Case 1:25-cv-00069 Document 26 Filed 01/14/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
Case 1:25-cv-00069
Document 26 Filed 01/14/26 in TXSD
Page 1 of 2
United States District Court Southern District of Texas
1 ENTERED January 14, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION
ROSA MARES, et al., "Plaintiffs,"
§ § v. NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, CHAPTER 10 and ROBERTO § BRISEÑO, "Defendants."
das las las cas las las cas las cas cas
Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-00069
ORDER
Before the Court are "Plaintiffs' First Amended Original Complaint" (Dkt. No. 17) ("Complaint"), "Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment" (Dkt. No. 18) ("MTD"), "Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment" (Dkt. No. 19) ("Response"), "Defendants' Reply in Support of Their Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment" (Dkt. No. 20) ("Reply"), "Plaintiffs' Sur-Reply to Defendants' Reply to Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment" (Dkt. No. 22) ("Surreply"), and the Magistrate Judge's "Report and Recommendations" (Dkt. No. 25) ("R&R"). The R&R recommends this Court grant the MTD and dismiss the Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 25 at 14.
The R&R was published December 22, 2025. Dkt. No. 25. Objections to the R&R were due January 5, 2026. No objections have been filed. The Court thus reviews the R&R's conclusions for plain error. See Guillory v. PPG Indus., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005).
Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the R&R (Dkt. No. 25). The MTD (Dkt. No. 18) is GRANTED, and the Complaint (Dkt. No. 17) is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby ORDERED to close this case.
AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO
Case 1:25-cv-00069 Document 26 Filed 01/14/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2
Signed on this 14" day of January, 2026.
ple SA
Rol Cn
Unitéd States District JudgeWas bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.