5:25-cv-00055•Fullen v. The City of Lubbock et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTzuCT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION TONY FULLEN, Plaintiff, CITY OF LUBBOCK, et a1., Defendants. No. 5:25-CV-055-H ORDER The United States Magistrate Judge issued Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (FCR) that the defendants' motion to quash (Dkt. No. 12) be denied as moot. Dkt. No. 22. No objections were filed. Where no specific objections are filed within the l4-day period, the Court reviews the Magistrate Judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendations or y for plain error. Serano v. Customs & Border Patol, U.S. Customs & Border Prot.,975 F.3d 488, 502 (5th Cn. 2020). The District Court has reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts and adops the FCR. The defendants' motion to quash @kt. No. 12) is therefore denied as moot. So ordered on February a,2026 JAMES SLEY HENDRIX UNITE STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 5:25-cv-00055-H Document 23 Filed 02/03/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.