Jones v. Santoyo et al

3:25-cv-03247Txnd02.04.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
MICHAEL DARNELL JONES,
Plaintiff,
VS.
GUILLERMO SANTOYO, JR., ET AL.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
) CIVIL ACTION NO.
)
) 3:25-CV-3247-G-BW
)
)
)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a
recommendation in this case. The District Judge has made a de novo review of those
portions of the FCR to which objections were made and has reviewed all other
portions of the FCR for plain error. The objections are overruled, and the court finds
no plain error with respect to the remainder of the FCR. Accordingly, the plaintiff’s
lawsuit is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction.
SO ORDERED.
April 2, 2026.
___________________________________
A. JOE FISH
Senior United States District Judge
Case 3:25-cv-03247-G-BW Document 76 Filed 04/02/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID <pageID>

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.