3:24-cv-02734•Al-Atoum v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION KIMBERLY AL-ATOUM, § § Plaintiff, § § V. § No. 3:24-cv-2734-S-BN § WAL-MART STORES TEXAS, LLC, § § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TERMINATING AS NOT NECESSARY MOTION FOR EXTENSION On March 24, 2026, Plaintiff Kimberly Al-Atoum filed a notice of appeal [Dkt. No. 47] as to the February 27, 2026 judgment [Dkt. No. 46] and moved to extend the time to file a notice of appeal [Dkt. No. 48]. See also Dkt. No. 45 (February 27 order accepting the January 23, 2026 magistrate judge’s findings, conclusions, and recommendation [Dkt. No. 44] (the “FCR”)). Al-Atoum’s notice of appeal filed on March 24 is timely because it was “filed with the district clerk within 30 days after entry of the judgment.” FED . R. APP. P. 4(a)(1)(A). And, to the extent that Al-Atoum may believe otherwise because she intends to appeal the FCR, and her notice was not filed within 30 days after entry of the FCR, the FCR was neither an order of the Court nor appealable to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (as an order of the Court) until it “was converted into an order on [February 27]” – instead, “it was merely advisory” when it was entered on January 23. James v. Smith, 152 F.4th 594, 603-04 (5th Cir. 2025) (citing United Case 3:24-cv-02734-S-BN Document 50 Filed 03/25/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID <pageID>
- 2 - States v. Cooper, 135 F.3d 960, 963 (5th Cir. 1998) (“The magistrate judge’s report is nothing like a jury verdict or the oral disposition of a district judge, for the magistrate’s role under [28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)] is advisory, not adjudicatory.... In short, [under Section 636(b)(1)(B)], ‘the magistrate has no authority to make a final and binding disposition.’” (quoting United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 673 (1980)))). The Court therefore requests that the Clerk of Court TERMINATE the motion for extension [Dkt. No. 48]. SO ORDERED. DATED: March 25, 2026 _________________________________________ DAVID L. HORAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case 3:24-cv-02734-S-BN Document 50 Filed 03/25/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.