Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company v. Bullnose Masonry LLC

3:24-cv-02516Txnd04.03.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
FRANKENMUTH MUTUAL §
INSURANCE COMPANY, §
§
Plaintiff, §
§
V. § No. 3:24-cv-2516-X
§
BULLNOSE MASONRY, LLC, §
§
Defendant. §
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a
recommendation in this case. No objections were filed.1 The District Court reviewed
the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding
none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the
United States Magistrate Judge.
The Court therefore DENIES Plaintiff Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance
Company’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees [Dkt. No. 16].
The Court further ORDERS Frankenmuth to refile its motion and file an
unredacted copy of their billing records under seal within fourteen (14) days of the
issuance of this order.
1 In Frankenmuth’s Objection to the Report and Recommendation, it concedes that the records were
overly redacted and seeeks opportunity to supplement their motion with corrected records. Doc. 21
at 1–4. So Frankenmuth did not identify any errors made by the Magistrate Judge that would merit
de novo review.
Case 3:24-cv-02516-X Document 22 Filed 03/04/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID <pageID>
SO ORDERED this 4th day of March, 2026.
_________________________________________
BRANTLEY STARR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:24-cv-02516-X Document 22 Filed 03/04/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID <pageID>

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.