3:24-cv-01601•Nguyen v. Bergami
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION XUAN NGUYEN, § #A074-484-667, § § Petitioner, § § v. § No. 3:24-cv-1601-E (BT) § THOMAS BERGAMI, § § Respondent. § MEMORANDUM OPINON AND ORDER Petitioner Xuan Nguyen filed a habeas application under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 claiming that he has been detained pending removal for an unreasonable amount of time. Pet. at 7 (ECF No. 3). The Court liberally construed these allegations as asserting claims for violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1231 and the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. As relief, Tranh seeks release from ICE custody. Id. at 8. On August 15, 2024, Respondent filed a “Notice of Release” informing the Court that ICE released Nguyen from custody after he filed this § 2241 application. Notice at 1 (ECF No. 7). Respondent asks the Court to dismiss this case as moot under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). Id. “Article III of the Constitution limits federal ‘Judicial Power,’ that is, federal-court jurisdiction, to ‘Cases’ and ‘Controversies.’” United States Parole Comm'n v. Geraghty, 445 U.S. 388, 395 (1980). A case becomes moot “when the issues presented are no longer ‘live’ or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome.” Id. at 396 (quoting Powell v. McCormack, 395 U.S. 486, 496 (1969)). Case 3:24-cv-01601-E-BT Document 8 Filed 03/23/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID <pageID>
2 The habeas petition only seeks Nguyen’s release from custody pending his removal. Since he is no longer detained pending removal, his sole ground for relief is now moot, and this court lacks jurisdiction to consider his petition. See, e.g., Singh v. Mukasey, 2009 WL 1097255, at *1 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 22, 2009); Caquias v. Dist. Dir. of ICE, 2008 WL 5378173, at *1 (N.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 2009). Conclusion The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). SO ORDERED. March 23, 2026. ______________________________ ADA BROWN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 3:24-cv-01601-E-BT Document 8 Filed 03/23/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.