Foreman v. BMW Financial Services NA, LLC

6:25-cv-00281Txed06.02.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

- 1 -
No. 6:25-cv-00281
Kimberly Banfield Foreman,
Plaintiff,
v.
BMW Financial Services NA, LLC,
Defendant.
O R D E R
The court dismissed this case and entered final judgment on
November 18, 2025. Doc. 31. Plaintiff moved to vacate and void
judgment. Doc. 32. The magistrate judge issued a report recom-
mending that the court deny plaintiff’s motion to vacate. Doc. 37
at 2. Plaintiff received a copy of the report on January 12, 2026.
Doc. 39. No party has filed written objections.
When there have been no timely objections to a report, “the
court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face
of the record.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee’s notes
to 1983 amendment. Having reviewed the record and being satis-
fied that there is no clear error, the court accepts the report’s find-
ings and recommendations. The court denies plaintiff’s motion
to vacate (Doc. 32).
So ordered by the court on February 6, 2026.
J. CAM PB EL L BA RK ER
United States District Judge
Case 6:25-cv-00281-JCB-KNM Document 41 Filed 02/06/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.