Hill, Jr. v Money Matchmaker Co., et al

4:25-cv-00558Txed25.02.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
ADEAN HILL, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
MONEY MATCHMAKER CO., ET AL.
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 4:25-cv-00558
Judge Mazzant/Judge Davis
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On January 23, 2026, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #38) that
Defendant Howard Needle’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #11), Defendant Howard
Needle’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #24), and Defendant Burton Brooks’s Motion to Dismiss
(Dkt. #30) be dismissed without prejudice as premature.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no timely objections
being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge
are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Needle’s Motion for Summary Judgment
(Dkt. #11), Defendant Needle’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #24), and Defendant Brooks’s Motion
to Dismiss (Dkt. #30) are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Case 4:25-cv-00558-ALM-BD Document 41 Filed 02/25/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>
2
Case 4:25-cv-00558-ALM-BD Document 41 Filed 02/25/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 4:25-cv-00558-ALM-BD Document 41 Filed 02/25/26 Page 1 of 2 PagelD #:
<pagelD>

United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION
ADEAN HILL, JR., §
Plaintiff, ; Civil Action No. 4:25-cv-00558
V. § Judge Mazzant/Judge Davis
MONEY MATCHMAKER CO., ET AL. ;
Defendants. ;
§

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On January 23, 2026, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #38) that
Defendant Howard Needle’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #11), Defendant Howard
Needle’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #24), and Defendant Burton Brooks’s Motion to Dismiss
(Dkt. #30) be dismissed without prejudice as premature.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no timely objections
being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge
are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Needle’s Motion for Summary Judgment
(Dkt. #11), Defendant Needle’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #24), and Defendant Brooks’s Motion
to Dismiss (Dkt. #30) are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

AUTHENTICATED
U.S. GOVERNMENT
INFORMATION

GPO

Case 4:25-cv-00558-ALM-BD Document 41 Filed 02/25/26 Page 2 of 2 PagelD #:
SIGNED this 25th day of February, 3036 >

AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES NSTRICT jUDGE

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.