Johnson v. MidFirst Bank

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 4:24-cv-00986-SDJ-BD Document 84 Filed 03/03/26 Page 1 of 2 PagelD #:
<pagelD>

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION
RHONDA MICHELLE JOHNSON §
§
v. § CIVIL NO. 4:24-CV-986-SDJ-BD
§
MIDFIRST BANK §
§
§

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in
this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 686. On September 2, 2025, the Magistrate Judge entered
proposed findings of fact and a recommendation (the “Report”), (Dkt. #69), that
Plaintiff Rhonda Michelle Johnson’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Temporary Restraining
Order and Preliminary Injunction, (Dkt. #62), be denied. Plaintiff filed Objections,
(Dkt. #70), to the Report.

The Court conducted a de novo review of the Objections and the portions of the
Report to which Defendant specifically objects, and the Court is of the opinion that
the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and that the
Objections are without merit as to the ultimate findings of the Magistrate Judge. The
Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the
findings and conclusions of the Court.

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and

Preliminary Injunction, (Dkt. #62), is DENIED.

INFORMATION

AUTHENTICATED
U.S. GOVERNMENT
GPO

Case 4:24-cv-00986-SDJ-BD Document 84 Filed 03/03/26 Page 2 of 2 PagelD #:
<pagelD>

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 3rd day of March, 2026.

_— D. we
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE