2:25-cv-01180•THE STATE OF TEXAS et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
THE STATE OF TEXAS et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
2:25-cv-01180Txed12.03.2026
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION THE STATE OF TEXAS, THE STATE OF TEXAS EX REL. JKJ PARTNERSHIP 2011, LP,, Plaintiffs, v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI S.A., DOE DEFENDANTS 2 TO 100, SANOFI US SERVICES INC. F/K/A SANOFI- AVENTIS U.S. INC., SANOFI- SYNTHELABO LLC, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § Case No. 2:25-CV-01180-JRG-RSP ORDER Defendant previously filed a Motion to Remand to State Court (Dkt. No. 14.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 35), recommending grant of Defendant’s Motion to Remand. Plaintiff has now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 39), with Defendant filing a Response (Dkt. No. 40.) After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion to Remand, the Report and Recommendation, and the briefing on Plaintiff’s Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiff’s Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and orders that this action be remanded to state court instanter. Case 2:25-cv-01180-JRG-RSP Document 41 Filed 03/12/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
____________________________________ RODNEY GILSTRAP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 12th day of March, 2026. Case 2:25-cv-01180-JRG-RSP Document 41 Filed 03/12/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.