2:25-cv-01090•Bailey v. Tractor Supply Company et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DANNY BAILEY, Plaintiff, v. TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY and TRACTOR SUPPLY CO. OF TEXAS, LP, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 2:25-CV-01090-JRG-RSP ORDER Plaintiff Danny Bailey (“Plaintiff”) previously filed a Motion to Remand to State Court (“Motion”) (Dkt. No. 5.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 25), recommending grant of Plaintiff’s Motion. Defendants Tractor Supply Company and Tractor Supply Company of Texas, LP (“Defendants”) have now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 26), with Plaintiff filing a Response (Dkt. No. 29.) After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Plaintiff’s Motion, the Report and Recommendation, and the briefing on Defendants’ Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Defendants’ Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and orders that the Motion (Dkt. No. 5) is GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the above-captioned case is REMANDED to the 71st Judicial District of Harrison County, Texas, instanter. . ____________________________________ RODNEY GILSTRAP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 12th day of March, 2026. Case 2:25-cv-01090-JRG-RSP Document 31 Filed 03/12/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.