Robert Bosch, LLC v. Westport Fuel Systems Canada, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
ROBERT BOSCH LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
WESTPORT FUEL SYSTEMS
CANADA INC.,
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
Case No. 2:23-cv-00038-JRG-RSP
ORDER
Westport filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on Bosch’s Marking Defense (Dkt.
No. 189), and Bosch filed a cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Damages
(Dkt. No. 182). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No.
309), recommending granting in part Westport’s Motion, and denying Bosch’s Motion.
Westport has now filed objections, and a Motion for Clarification (Dkt. No. 316), with Bosch
filing a Response (Dkt. No. 324), and their own objection (Dkt. No. 325). The Magistrate
Judge issued an Order (Dkt. No. 330) that clarified the Report and Recommendation.
After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Cross Motions for Summary
Judgment, the Report and Recommendation, the Court’s clarification, and the briefing on
both parties’ objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and
Recommendation and concludes that the objections fail to show that the Report and
Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiff and
Defendant’s Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, as clarified by Dkt.
No. 330 and orders that Westport’s Motion (Dkt. No. 189) is GRANTED in its entirety, and
Bosch’s Motion (Dkt. No. 182) is DENIED.
Case 2:23-cv-00038-JRG-RSP Document 351 Filed 03/12/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

____________________________________
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 12th day of March, 2026.
Case 2:23-cv-00038-JRG-RSP Document 351 Filed 03/12/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>