1:26-cv-00031•Alexander v. Hill-Kearse et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS JOSEPH ALEXANDER, versus DAWN HILL-KEARSE, SERGIO JIMENEZ, § § § § § § § § NO. 1:26-CV-00031-MAC-ZJH ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION On January 27, 2026, the Court referred this case to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge for pretrial management. On January 29, 2026, Judge Hawthorn ordered pro se Plaintiff Joseph Alexander (“Alexander”) to file an amended complaint that complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Eastern District of Texas Local Rules. (#4). After Alexander failed to comply with the Order (#4), Judge Hawthorn issued a Report and Recommendation (#7), which recommended dismissing Alexander’s case for want of prosecution. The court reviewed Judge Hawthorn’s Report and Recommendation (#7) along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. The court affirms Judge Hawthorn’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are correct. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time for doing so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Case 1:26-cv-00031-MAC-ZJH Document 9 Filed 03/17/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
2 It is therefore ORDERED that Judge Hawthorn’s Report and Recommendation (#7) dismissing this case without prejudice for want of prosecution is ADOPTED. The court will separately enter Final Judgment. ________________________________________ MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 17th day of March, 2026. Case 1:26-cv-00031-MAC-ZJH Document 9 Filed 03/17/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.