First Horizon Corporation et al v. Pinnacle Financial Partners

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
WESTERN DIVISION
The Court has before it a Joint Motion to Extend Deadline to complete Fact Witness
Depositions (Doc. 115), a Motion to Clarify or Modify the Fourth Amended Scheduling Order
(Doc. 116), and Motion for Protective Order (Doc. 117). In the Joint Motion to Extend Deadline,
the Parties ask that the fact witness deposition deadline be moved to November 20, 2026 as to all
remaining fact witness depositions. This Motion is GRANTED. The Parties are ADVISED that
additional requests for extensions will be viewed skeptically and will not be granted in the absence
of currently unforeseeable good cause.
Additionally, non-party Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., and John Houston filed
a Motion to Clarify or Modify the Fourth Amended Scheduling Order so that Mr. Houston’s
individual capacity deposition could be taken at the later date allowed for his deposition as a
FIRST HORIZON CORP.,
FIRST HORIZON BANK,
FIRST HORIZON ADVISORS, INC.
Plaintiff,
v.
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS,
PINNACLE BANK
Defendants.
Civil Action No.: 2:22-cv-02671-BCL-cgc
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE,
DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO CLARIFY, AND
DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case 2:22-cv-02671-BCL-cgc Document 118 Filed 10/15/26 Page 1 of 2
PageID <pageID>

corporate representative. Doc. 116. This Motion is DENIED as moot because the extension of the
fact witness deposition deadline has already allowed this relief.
Defendant Pinnacle Bank has also filed a Motion for Protective Order. Doc. 117. The
certificate of consultation states, “Pinnacle files its Motion for Protective Order to the extent the
Court declines to grant the parties’ joint motion to extend the deposition deadline.” Doc. 117-2 at
1. Because the Court has granted the joint motion, this Motion is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED on this 15th day of October, 2026.
s/Brian C. Lea_ ______________________
BRIAN C. LEA
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Case 2:22-cv-02671-BCL-cgc Document 118 Filed 10/15/26 Page 2 of 2
PageID <pageID>