De Lucena v. Tootsies Entertainment LLC et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
ORDER
Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report (Doc. No. 40), recommending
that Plaintiff’s motion to remand (Doc. No. 22) be granted, or in the alternative that Defendants’
motions to dismiss (Doc. Nos. 7, 11, 15, 19) be granted and Plaintiff be allowed to file an amended
complaint. Plaintiff has no objection to the recommendation to remand. (Doc. No. 41). Defendants
filed a response (Doc. No. 42) titled a “partial objection,” but fail to identify an error made by the
Magistrate Judge. Thus, their objection is without merit. See Howard v. Sec. of Health & Human
Servs., 932 F.2d 505, 509 (6th Cir. 1991) (Objections that do not identify an error are meritless).
Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the Court concludes that it should be
adopted and approved. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED, and this
matter is REMANDED to the Circuit Court for Davidson County, Tennessee. All remaining
pending motions are TERMINATED as moot. The Clerk is directed to close the file.
It is so ORDERED.
___________________________________
WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
VINICIUS BATISTA DE LUCENA,
Plaintiff,
v.
TOOTSIES ENTERTAINMENT
LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. 3:25-cv-00661
JUDGE CAMPBELL
MAGISTRATE JUDGE FRENSLEY
Case 3:25-cv-00661 Document 43 Filed 02/18/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>