2:24-cv-00054•Dahl III v. Tennessee Technological University
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COOKEVILLE DIVISION LORENZ DAHL III, Plaintiff, v. TENNESSEE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:24-cv-00054 ORDER Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. No. 22) recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for Plaintiff’s failure to effect service of process on Tennessee Technological University and Rule 41(6) for failure to prosecute claim. Plaintiff, Lorenz Dahl, III has not filed any timely objections to the R&R despite the R&R’s specific warnings regarding waiver. (See Doc. No. 22 at 12). Having thoroughly reviewed the R&R, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. Accordingly, the R&R (Doc. No. 22) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED, and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This is a final order. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 and close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 2:24-cv-00054 Document 23 Filed 12/03/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.