3:04-bk-04781•MAXON ENGINEERING SERVICES INC and G&G Developers Corp. ("G&G")
MAXON ENGINEERING SERVICES INC and G&G Developers Corp. ("G&G")
3:04-bk-04781Prb23.11.2005
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 Three opinions released contemporaneously with this opinion provide a more detailed account of the relationships and claims involving these parties. See In re Maxon Engineering Servs., Inc., No. 04- 04781 (Bankr. D. Puerto Rico Nov. 21, 2005) (“PREPA’s Rule 9023 Motion to Reconsider, Alter, Amend and for Additional Findings”); No. 04-04781, Adv. No. 05-00202 (Bankr. D. Puerto Rico Nov. 21, 2005) (PREPA’s “Motion to Dismiss”); No. 04-04781, Adv. No. 05-00202 (Bankr. D. Puerto Rico Nov. 21, 2005) (“Debtor’s Motion for Preliminary and Permanent Injunction Directing PREPA to Pay Outstanding Invoices”). UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO In re: Bk. No. 04-04781-MWV Chapter 11 Maxon Engineering Services, Inc., Debtor MEMORANDUM OPINION The Court has before it a motion for relief from the automatic stay filed on September 16, 2005, by the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”). Maxon Engineering Services, Inc. (the “Debtor”) filed its “Debtor’s Opposition to Request for Relief from the Automatic Stay Filed by PREPA” on September 28, 2005, and the Court held a hearing on the matter on September 29, 2005. JURISDICTION This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter and the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 157(a) and the “Standing Order of Resolution for Bankruptcy Cases” dated July 19, 1994 (Torruella, C.J.). This is a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b). BACKGROUND1 The Debtor is an engineering company that filed chapter 11 bankruptcy on May 5, 2004. The Debtor performed substantial work for PREPA both prior to and after filing for bankruptcy. Through an adversary proceeding, the Debtor has sought turnover of funds in excess of $500,000 for work performed by the Debtor post-petition (the “post-petition funds”). PREPA, though, alleges that the Debtor is liable Case:04-04781-MCF7 Doc#:810 Filed:11/23/05 Entered:11/23/05 13:50:31 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 3
2 Unless otherwise noted, all statutory section references herein are to the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978, as amended, 11 U.S.C. § 101, et seq. 2 for damages that PREPA may have to pay as a result of a related suit brought against PREPA by Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (“BBVA”) arising from assigned contracts involving PREPA, BBVA, and the Debtor. Essentially, PREPA erroneously disbursed checks payable only in the Debtor’s name when the checks were supposed to be made payable to both the Debtor and BBVA. Anticipating the suit against it by BBVA, PREPA placed an administrative hold on the post-petition funds owed the Debtor while PREPA investigated BBVA’s claim. In the event that PREPA is found liable to BBVA, PREPA would presumably seek to recover from the Debtor any damages paid to BBVA. DISCUSSION PREPA requests relief from the automatic stay pursuant to section 362(d)(1),2 which provides relief from the stay “for cause.” PREPA argues that the “cause” in this case is that it has a colorable claim of a right to set off the post-petition funds it owes Debtor against its claim against the Debtor arising from BBVA’s suit against PREPA. The Court has since determined that PREPA has no right of setoff because its claim against the Debtor is a prepetition claim, and a creditor may not use post-petition funds to set off prepetition claims. See In re Maxon Engineering Servs., Inc., No. 04-04781 (Bankr. D. Puerto Rico Nov. 21, 2005) (“PREPA’s Rule 9023 Motion to Reconsider, Alter, Amend and for Additional Findings”) (reconsidering and affirming its holding in In re Maxon Engineering Servs., Inc., (Bankr. D. Puerto Rico Sept. 13, 2005)). PREPA, therefore, is not entitled to relief from the automatic stay. CONCLUSION PREPA’s “Motion to Lift Stay” is denied. This opinion constitutes the Court’s findings and conclusions of law in accordance with Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7052. The Court will issue Case:04-04781-MCF7 Doc#:810 Filed:11/23/05 Entered:11/23/05 13:50:31 Desc: Main Document Page 2 of 3
3 a separate final order consistent with this opinion. DATED this 21st day of November, 2005, at Manchester, New Hampshire. /s/ Mark W. Vaughn Mark W. Vaughn Chief Bankruptcy Judge District of New Hampshire Sitting by designation Case:04-04781-MCF7 Doc#:810 Filed:11/23/05 Entered:11/23/05 13:50:31 Desc: Main Document Page 3 of 3
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.