Brill v. Croner et al

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 3:25-cv-02393-RDM Document13 _ Filed 03/05/26 Page1of2

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA >

: : : <

| O a
MATTHEW GLEN BRILL, et al., a E S$ js
: _/ ir >

Plaintiffs, : "+ 3:25-CV-2393 re 2 Je

! : (JUDGE MARIANI) Q = ™a

: (Chief Magistrate Judge Bloom)

PER

Vv.

SHAWN CRONER, et al.,

Defendants.
ORDER

AND NOW, THIS Z : | : DAY OF MARCH, 2026, upon review of Chief

Magistrate Judge Daryl Bloom's Report and Recommendation (“R&R’) (Doc. 8) for clear

error or manifest injustice,’ IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The R&R (Doc. 8) is ADOPTED for the reasons set forth therein.
2. Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

1 {fa party timely and properly files a written objection to a Magistrate Judge's Report and.
Recommendation, the District Court “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or
specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C);
see also, Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011); M.D. Pa. Local Rule 72.3. Here, following the
issuance of the R&R, Brill filed several documents which arguably attempt to expand the factual allegations

which he may believe support his claims in this action (see Docs. 9, 10). Nonetheless, Plaintiffs filings are
insufficient to rise to the level of one or more Objections to the R&R. Brill’s filings do not reference the
R&R, nor do they set forth any statement or assertion which would alter the correctness of the pending
R&R or affect this Court’s review of the R&R. The Court thus need not engage in a de novo analysis.
Nonetheless, upon review of the relevant documents, even if this Court applied a de novo review, the result

would be the'same.

Case 3:25-cv-02393-RDM Document 13 Filed 03/05/26 Page 2 of 2

3. Plaintiffs may file an Amended Complaint within 21 days of the date of this
Order. Failure to file an Amended Complaint may result in the dismissal of the

above-captioned action.

Robert D~Mariant
United States District Judge