3:22-cv-01916•Helwig v. Myers et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SUSAN HELWIG, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL J. MYERS, PH.D., and MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-CV-01916 (MEHALCHICK, J.) ORDER AND NOW, this 15th day of January, 2026, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion concurrently filed herewith, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ motions for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (Doc. 42). Defendants’ motion is GRANTED as to Counts I, II, II, and VI. (Doc. 42). Helwig’s claims of age discrimination, sex discrimination, and disability discrimination and harassment are DISMISSED. (Doc. 1). Defendants’ motion is GRANTED as to Count VII. (Doc. 42). Helwig’s claims of ADA, ADEA, PHRA, and FMLA retaliation are DISMISSED. (Doc. 1). Defendants’ motion is GRANTED as to Count V. (Doc. 42). Helwig’s claims of harassment and hostile work environment are DISMISSED. (Doc. 1). Defendants’ motion is DENIED as to Counts IV of FMLA failure to notify and FMLA interference. (Doc. 42). Finally, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED as to Count VII. (Doc. 42). Helwig’s claims of defamation are DISMISSED. (Doc. 1). BY THE COURT: s/ Karoline Mehalchick KAROLINE MEHALCHICK United States District Judge Case 3:22-cv-01916-KM Document 64 Filed 01/15/26 Page 1 of 1
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.