Johnson et al v. Anderson et al

5:25-cv-01489Okwd08.01.2026

Originalquelle öffnen

Gesamter Gesetzestext

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
ELIJAH JOHNSON, individually, and as )
Natural Parent of A.J., a minor child, C.J., )
a minor child, H.J., a minor child, and E.J., )
a minor child, )
)
Plaintiffs, )
)
v. ) Case No. CIV-25-1489-SLP
)
STANLEY ANDERSON, et al., )
)
Defendants. )
O R D E R
Before the Court is Defendant LB Horton, LLC’s Partial Motion to Dismiss [Doc.
No. 4]. Subsequent to the filing of Defendant’s Motion, Plaintiff filed an Amended
Complaint [Doc. No. 10]. “The [A]mended [C]omplaint, as the operative complaint,
supersedes the original complaint’s allegations[.]” May v. Segovia, 929 F.3d 1223, 1229
(10th Cir. 2019). Thus, those allegations are of “no legal effect.” Davis v. TXO Prod.
Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, LB Horton, LLC’s Partial
Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 4] is DENIED as MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of January, 2026.
Case 5:25-cv-01489-SLP Document 11 Filed 01/08/26 Page 1 of 2
Case 5:25-cv-01489-SLP Document 11 Filed 01/08/26 Page 2 of 2

1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 5:25-cv-01489-SLP Document 11 Filed 01/08/26 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
ELIJAH JOHNSON, individually, and as )
Natural Parent of A.J., a minor child, C.J., )
) a minor child, H.J., a minor child, and E.J., a minor child, )
Plaintiffs,
) )
)
)
STANLEY ANDERSON, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
ORDER
Before the Court is Defendant LB Horton, LLC's Partial Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 4]. Subsequent to the filing of Defendant's Motion, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 10]. "The [A]mended [C]omplaint, as the operative complaint, supersedes the original complaint's allegations[.]" May v. Segovia, 929 F.3d 1223, 1229 (10th Cir. 2019). Thus, those allegations are of "no legal effect." Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, LB Horton, LLC's Partial Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 4] is DENIED as MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of January, 2026.
Satt 2 Pulk
SCOTT L. PALK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO
)
Case No. CIV-25-1489-SLP V.

Case 5:25-cv-01489-SLP Document 11 Filed 01/08/26 Page 2 of 2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.