Albright v. GEO Group Inc et al

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
JOSHUA ROY ALBRIGHT, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
v. 	) 	Case No. CIV-23-976-PRW
)
GEO GROUP, et al., 	)
)
Defendant. 	)
ORDER
On February 26, 2026, United States Magistrate Judge Amanda Leigh Maxfield
issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 81) in this action, in which she recommends
that the Court deny Plaintiff Joshua Roy Albright’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt.
59). 	Judge 	Maxfield 	advised 	Albright 	of 	his 	right 	to 	object 	to 	the 	Report 	and
Recommendation by March 19, 2026, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 72, and that failure to make a timely objection would waive any right to
appellate 	review 	of 	the 	factual 	and 	legal 	issues 	addressed 	in 	the 	Report 	and
Recommendation.
To date, Albright has filed no objections. He has therefore waived his right to
appellate 	review 	of 	the 	factual 	and 	legal 	issues 	addressed 	in 	the 	Report 	and
Recommendation.1 In the absence of a timely objection, the Court reviews the Report and
1 United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1059–60 (10th Cir. 1996).
Case 5:23-cv-00976-PRW Document 83 Filed 03/31/26 Page 1 of 2

2
Recommendation to confirm that there is no plain error on the face of the record.2 Finding
none, the Court agrees with Judge Maxfield’s analysis and conclusions. Accordingly, the
Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 81) in full and DENIES the
Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 59).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of March 2026.
2 Summers v. State of Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167–68 (10th Cir. 1991) (“In the absence of
timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate's report under any standard it
deems appropriate.”).
Case 5:23-cv-00976-PRW Document 83 Filed 03/31/26 Page 2 of 2