United States of America v. Hudson et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
v. 	) 	Case No. CR-16-119-R-8
)
DAVID DEAN CAGLE, 	)
)
Defendant. 	)
ORDER
Before the Court is Defendant’s pro se Motion [Doc. No. 1903] seeking a sentence
reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 821 to the U.S. Sentencing
Guidelines. The United States responded in opposition [Doc. No. 1909] and the matter is
now at issue.
Upon review of the parties’ submissions and the Probation Office’s Preliminary
Report for Consideration of Sentence Reduction Based on Amendment 821 [Doc. No.
1904], the Court finds that Defendant is ineligible for a sentence reduction under
Amendment 821.
Accordingly, Defendant’s motion [Doc. No. 1903] is DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 15 th day of February 2024.
Case 5:16-cr-00119-R Document 1916 Filed 02/15/24 Page 1 of 1