3:97-cv-00346•Frantz, et al v. Bradford Village of, et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON JACK FRANTZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BRADFORD VILLAGE, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 3:97-cv-346 Judge Thomas M. Rose ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REVIVE DORMANT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT/JUDGMENT DEBTOR SHANE DUFFEY (DOC. NO. 116) ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Revive Dormant Judgment Against Defendant/Judgment Debtor Shane Duffey (“Motion”) (Doc. No. 116), filed by Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor Jack Frantz. The Court has considered the Motion, and, for good cause shown and by agreement of the Parties (see Doc. No. 122), the Court finds that there is no evidence that the judgment has been paid or satisfied in full, and the Motion is timely made under the applicable ten-year statute of limitations. Therefore, the Court hereby GRANTS the instant Motion to Revive Dormant Judgment Against Defendant/Judgment Debtor Shane Duffey (Doc. No. 116). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that from the date of this Order, the judgment entered on April 8, 2003, in favor of Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor Jack Frantz against Defendant/Judgment Debtor Shane Duffey in the principal amount of $100,000.00 is REVIVED, having become dormant under Ohio law on June 25, 2023. The revived judgment shall bear interest at 1.19% per annum from April 8, 2003, the date Case: 3:97-cv-00346-TMR Doc #: 123 Filed: 03/02/26 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2 of the now-revived judgment, to June 25, 2023, and from the date of this Order, the date of revival, until the judgment is satisfied in full. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to note revival of the April 8, 2003 judgment on the Court’s docket. DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Monday, March 2, 2026. s/Thomas M. Rose ________________________________ THOMAS M. ROSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case: 3:97-cv-00346-TMR Doc #: 123 Filed: 03/02/26 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.