3:25-cv-00382•Puckett v. Cross River Bank et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISIONAT DAYTON REBECCA PUCKETT CASE NO. 3:25-CV-382 Plaintiff, JUDGE WALTER H. RICE V. CROSS RIVER BANK AND SUNLIGHT FINANCIAL LLC d/b/a SUNLIGHT FINANCIAL Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL; TERMINATION ENTRY The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDEREDthat this action is hereby DISMISSED,with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Parties intendingto preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U. S. 375 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 23 February 2026 WALTER H. RICE, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Case: 3:25-cv-00382-WHR-CHG Doc #: 19 Filed: 02/23/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.