3:25-cv-00271•Martin v. Whittaker
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON MARK MARTIN, Petitioner, Case No. 3:25-cv-271 vs. SHERIFF MARK WHITTAKER, District Judge Michael J. Newman Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers Respondent. _______________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. No. 8); AND (2) DISMISSING THIS MATTER WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE _______________________________________________________________________________________ The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers (Doc. No. 8), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time for doing so under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired. Upon careful review of the foregoing, the Court determines that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. See Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005). Accordingly, the Court: (1) ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge in its entirety; and (2) DISMISSES this matter without prejudice for failure to prosecute. This case is CLOSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. November 12, 2025 s/Michael J. Newman Hon. Michael J. Newman United States District Judge Case: 3:25-cv-00271-MJN-EPD Doc #: 9 Filed: 11/12/25 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.