3:25-cv-00003•Baker v. PJ Ohio, LLC et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON JOSHUA BAKER and TRISTAN BERGHOFF- WAGNER, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Case No. 3:25-cv-3 vs. SERAZEN, LLC, PJ OHIO, LLC, PJ LAS VEGAS, LLC, PJ NORTH CAROLINA, LLC, DOUG PAK and DARCIE MANGUS, District Judge Michael J. Newman Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr. Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY (Doc. No. 27) IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION ______________________________________________________________________________ For good cause shown, and to ensure all issues are adequately addressed, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a sur-reply in opposition to Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration. Doc. No. 27. IT IS SO ORDERED. December 5, 2025 s/Michael J. Newman Hon. Michael J. Newman United States District Judge Case: 3:25-cv-00003-MJN-PBS Doc #: 33 Filed: 12/05/25 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.