USA v. Sallis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, 	Case No. 3:25-cr-6
vs.
MAURICE EDWARD SALLIS, 	District Judge Michael J. Newman
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE THE
SUPPRESSION HEARING (Doc. No. 71); (2) VACATING THE DECEMBER 3, 2025
SUPPRESSION HEARING DATE; (3) REQUIRING THE PARTIES TO MEET AND
CONFER AND FILE, BY DECEMBER 9, 2025, A JOINT NOTICE SELECTING ONE OF
THE DATES SET FORTH BELOW FOR A HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
SUPPRESS (Doc. No. 64)
______________________________________________________________________________
This criminal case is before the Court upon pro se Defendant’s motion to suppress (Doc. No.
64) and Defendant’s unopposed motion to continue the suppression hearing (Doc. No. 71).1 For good
cause shown, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s unopposed motion. 	Accordingly, the Court
VACATES the December 3, 2025 suppression hearing.
The Court has two upcoming dates and times available to reset the requested hearing:
December 18, 2025 at 11:00 A.M., and January 6, 2026 at 9:30 A.M. The Court ORDERS the parties
to meet and confer and FILE A JOINT NOTICE, by December 9, 2025, selecting one of the above
dates and times for the hearing. Thereafter, the Court will issue an Order setting the hearing on one
of the requested dates and times.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
December 2, 2025 	s/Michael J. Newman
Hon. Michael J. Newman
United States District Judge
1 As with all pro se litigants, Defendant’s documents and allegations are liberally construed in his favor. See
Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam).
Case: 3:25-cr-00006-MJN Doc #: 72 Filed: 12/02/25 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>