3:24-cv-00192•Leigh v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON BRANDON W. LEIGH Petitioner, vs. WARDEN, LONDON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent. : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 3:24-cv-192 District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. NO. 28); TERMINATING ACTION This case is currently before the Court on the Report and Recommendations (“Report”) (Doc. No. 28) issued by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers. In the Report, Magistrate Judge Deavers recommends that Petitioner Brandon W. Leigh’s (“Leigh”) petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. Nos. 1-1 & 19) be denied with prejudice. (Doc. No. 28 at PageID 1802-03.) As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Noting that no objections to Magistrate Judge Deavers’ Report have been filed and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 28). It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. Leigh’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. Nos. 1-1 & 19) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; 2. The Court finds that Leigh has not stated a viable claim or presented an issue deserving of appellate review. Therefore, the Court DENIES Leigh a certificate of appealability regarding this Order; Case: 3:24-cv-00192-TMR-EPD Doc #: 31 Filed: 01/08/26 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2 3. The Court finds that any appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith. Therefore, the Court DENIES Leigh leave to appeal this Order in forma pauperis; and, 4. The Clerk is hereby directed to TERMINATE this matter on the Court’s docket. DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Thursday, January 8, 2026. s/Thomas M. Rose ________________________________ THOMAS M. ROSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case: 3:24-cv-00192-TMR-EPD Doc #: 31 Filed: 01/08/26 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.