3:24-cv-00010•Clay v. Gateway Financial Solutions
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON KEVIN CLAY, Plaintiff, v. GATEWAY FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, Defendant, : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 3:24-cv-10 Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry ______________________________________________________________________________ ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 4), AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 3) ______________________________________________________________________________ Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 4) of Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry, issued on November 7, 2025. Therein, Magistrate Judge Gentry recommends that the Court dismiss Plaintiff Kevin Clay’s (“Plaintiff”) pending federal claims for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Id. at PageID 25-27.) Magistrate Judge Gentry further recommends that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s pending state law claims, as he cannot conceivably establish diversity jurisdiction. (Id. at PageID 28-30.) The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case and, noting that no objections have been filed regarding Magistrate Judge Gentry’s Report and Recommendation, and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, the Court hereby ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Gentry’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 4) in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 3) is hereby DISMISSED and the Clerk is directed to TERMINATE this matter on the Court’s docket. The Court further CERTIFIES that an appeal Case: 3:24-cv-00010-TMR-CHG Doc #: 5 Filed: 12/05/25 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2 of this Order would not be taken in good faith and Plaintiff is therefore DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Friday, December 5, 2025. s/Thomas M. Rose ________________________________ THOMAS M. ROSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case: 3:24-cv-00010-TMR-CHG Doc #: 5 Filed: 12/05/25 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.