3:24-cr-00045•USA v. Garnett et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:24-cr-45(3) vs. MARVIOUS HESTER, District Judge Michael J. Newman Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT MARVIOUS HESTER’S ORAL, UNOPPOSED MOTION TO REMOVE LOCATION MONITORING; AND (2) CONFIRMING DEFENDANT REMAINS UNDER ALL PREVIOUSLY-SET CONDITIONS OF RELEASE (Doc. No. 100) UNTIL HIS VOLUNTARY SURRENDER ______________________________________________________________________________ On March 12, 2026, at Defendant’s sentencing hearing, Defendant made an oral, unopposed motion to remove his location monitoring until his voluntary surrender. The Court heard from counsel for both sides and United States Pretrial Services Officer John McCabe. There being no opposition to the request, and for good cause shown, Defendant’s unopposed motion to remove location monitoring is GRANTED. All previously-set conditions of release (Doc. No. 100) are UNCHANGED and remain in full force and effect until his voluntary surrender. IT IS SO ORDERED. March 17, 2026 s/Michael J. Newman Hon. Michael J. Newman United States District Judge Case: 3:24-cr-00045-MJN Doc #: 268 Filed: 03/17/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.