2:25-cv-01473•Walker v. Winfrey
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MAURICE L. WALKER, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER WINFREY, Defendant. : : Case No. 2:25-cv-1473 Chief Judge Sarah D. Morrison Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s January 12, 2026 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 3.) There, the Magistrate Judge performed an initial screen of Plaintiff Maurice L. Walker’s Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and recommended that the Complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. (Id.) The time for filing objections has passed, and no objections have been filed.1 The Court ADOPTS and AFFIRMS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 3) and DISMISSES the Complaint (ECF No. 1-1). The Court further CERTIFIES that any appeal of the above-captioned action would not be taken in good faith. The Clerk is DIRECTED to TERMINATE this case from the docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Sarah D. Morrison SARAH D. MORRISON, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 Plaintiff filed an “Affidavit of Truth” on January 29, 2026. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff’s filing does not object to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and is therefore not considered by the Court here. Case: 2:25-cv-01473-SDM-EPD Doc #: 5 Filed: 02/06/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.