Prince v. State Of Ohio

2:25-cv-01273Ohsd11.02.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS
KELLIE J. PRINCE., 	: 	Case No. 2:25-cv-1273
Petitioner, 	:
- vs - 	: 	District Judge James L. Graham
Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz
STATE OF OHIO 	:
Respondent. 	:
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) of the Magistrate Judge
to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections were
filed, and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby
ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. It is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion for
bail (Doc. 2) and motion for a temporary continuation of bond (Doc. 3) are DENIED.
The Magistrate Judge further issued two orders (Docs. 15, 17) requiring Petitioner to show
cause why this case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Petitioner has not responded
to either show cause order. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED for want of prosecution.
The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Petitioner at the Ohio
Reformatory for Women.
DATE: February 11, 2026 	s/ James L. Graham
James L. Graham
United States District Judge
Case: 2:25-cv-01273-JLG-KLL Doc #: 18 Filed: 02/11/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.