2:25-cv-00978•Li v. Wide Open West, Inc et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
Cristy Li,
Plaintiff,
V.
Wide Open West, Inc., et al.,
doing business as Breezeline
Defendants.
Case No. 2:25-cv-978
Judge Michael H. Watson
Magistrate Judge Vascura
ORDER
The Magistrate Judge screened the Complaint in this case pursuant to 28
U. S. C. § 1915(e)(2) and issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"),
recommending the Court dismiss the Complaint, without prejudice, for lack of
subject-matter jurisdiction. R&R, ECF No. 7. The R&R notified Plaintiff of her
right to object to that recommendation and of the consequences of failing to do
so. Id. at 5. Plaintiff failed to object. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R&R
without conducting a de novo review and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE
the Complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The Clerk shall terminate
this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I HAELH. ATSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case: 2:25-cv-00978-MHW-CMV Doc #: 8 Filed: 01/13/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.