2:25-cv-00311•Case Name in Social Security Case - Unavailable
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION BRITTANY S., Plaintiff, Case No. 2:25-cv-311 v. JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ORDER This matter is before the Court on a Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on February 18, 2026. (ECF No. 13.) The time for filing objections has passed and no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and AFFIRMS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 13.) For the reasons set forth therein, Plaintiff’s Statement of Errors is GRANTED; the Commissioner’s non-disability finding is REVERSED; and this action is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with the Report and Recommendation. No finding is made as to whether Plaintiff was under a “disability” within the meaning of the Social Security Act. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment and terminate this case from the docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. 3/13/2026 s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. DATE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case: 2:25-cv-00311-EAS-CHG Doc #: 14 Filed: 03/13/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.